| Author |
Message |
gumer
Member
|
# Posted: 23 Jan 08 18:17
Reply
I want to take advantage of this opportunity to be grateful for the promoters and managers of these pages for the opportunity that they offer to us to expose our photos.
Later I ask for excuses for my poor knowledge of the English language; I will try to do the possible better thing.
Entering to the topic that worries me and it is a question of the order in which the photos appear on having effected (having carried out) a search that is, for example between two certain dates and which they appear for punctuation (rating). Well, so if I am not wrong, first there appear all those that have 5 of average punctuation, and as soon as the last one appears even with the only (unique) vote of 5, there start appearing those who have a bit less than five, let's put for example 4,95.
Well then, it can happen (and generally it happens) that after many photos with the only (unique) vote of 5 appear photos with twenty or thirty votes of five and one only one of 4 or 3 or 1 (that it motivates not to have an average punctuation of five).
I propose that the order of appearance should be depending on the number of votes of five or for the total sum of the voted (passed) punctuations, which always will be (to my modest way of dealing) more rightly than the current system.
Thank you very much to allow me to bring here this suggestion.
|
Oscar_
Moderator
|
# Posted: 23 Jan 08 19:55
Reply
Well gumer I totally agree with you. I'm sharing this problem for some long time now. Solution is to go directly to the pictures that has less point as 5.
But let us wait till Woophy 2.0, Joris said the whole rating system wil be upgraded.
Thing can get only better not worse ;-)
|
|
gumer
Member
|
# Posted: 23 Jan 08 19:59
Reply
Thank You very much, Oscar
Well .... I'd like ask You another question. Do You know something about a date of start to Woophy 2.0?.
Thanks again.
|
devish
Member
|
# Posted: 23 Jan 08 20:03
Reply
Hi Gumer, we (or at least I) don't know, but it should not be long before it starts, we are all very anxious to see the result!
|
|
gumer
Member
|
# Posted: 23 Jan 08 20:11
Reply
I give certainly that the programmers of the database will have gathered many suggestions and that the new version will have many improvements. I stick fast to the group of anxious!. : )
Thank You Devish.
|
|
Oscar_
Moderator
|
# Posted: 23 Jan 08 20:25
Reply
I agree with devish ;-)
|
grumpyman
Member
|
# Posted: 25 Jan 08 11:53 - Edited by: grumpyman
Reply
I was told last time i brought this up that its not the size of the rating its how many you have. so this should make pointless downrating POINTLESS .
Hurry up woophy 2
Regards jonny
|
Paulo Calafate
Member
|
# Posted: 25 Jan 08 16:56
Reply
the Woophy 2.0 has good news for downraters!
|
Online now: Guests - 2 Members - 0